Comments from Website author: Note that in every discussion of silver salts, or silver nitrate, silver sulphadiazine, etc., these are all different products than "colloidal silver".
Comments from Physicians at this article's end: None

Comparison of the in-vitro activities of the topical antimicrobials azelaic acid, nitrofurazone, silver sulphadiazine and mupirocin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

J Antimicrob Chemother 29: 661-8 (1992)[92372539]

Department of Medical Microbiology, Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine, Hampstead, London, UK.

Abstract

The in-vitro activities of the topical agents azelaic acid, nitrofurazone, silver sulphadiazine and mupirocin have been determined against 80 strains of MRSA collected from worldwide sources. MICs were determined by agar dilution (with an inoculum of approximately 5.0 x 10(5) cfu) in Iso-Sensitest agar, and MBCs were measured by replica-plating from MIC plates using velvet pads. The agents tested were uniformly active against MRSA, mupirocin being the most active (MIC50 0.15 mg/L) followed by nitrofurazone (MIC50 19 mg/L), silver sulphadiazine (MIC50 85 mg/L) and azelaic acid (MIC50 850 mg/L). Concentrations of azelaic acid, nitrofurazone and silver sulphadiazine close to the MIC were bactericidal, but mupirocin was only bactericidal at concentrations substantially greater than the MIC. In time-kill experiments, azelaic acid and nitrofurazone were gradually bactericidal, silver sulphadiazine was rapidly bactericidal and mupirocin was not bactericidal. Silver sulphadiazine killed sulphonamide-sensitive and sulphonamide-resistant strains equally rapidly. No resistant mutants were found to azelaic acid, nitrofurazone or silver sulphadiazine in an inoculum of 10(9) cfu, but two strains yielded (frequency: 1.0 x 10(-9)) mutants resistant to mupirocin. Our in-vitro results suggest azelaic acid, nitrofurazone and silver sulphadiazine could be of use for clearing staphylococcal carriage.

P. A. Maple, J. M. Hamilton-Miller & W. Brumfitt